Skip to main content
NIH Intramural Research Program, Our Research Changes Lives

Navigation controls

  • Search
  • Menu

Social follow links

  • Podcast
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Main navigation

  • About Us
    • What Is the IRP?
    • History
    • Honors
      • Nobel Prize
      • Lasker Award
      • Breakthrough Prize
      • Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE)
      • Presidential Medal of Freedom
      • National Medal of Science
      • Searle Scholars
      • The National Academy of Sciences
      • The National Academy of Medicine
      • The National Academy of Engineering
      • The American Academy of Arts and Sciences
      • National Medal of Technology & Innovation
      • Samuel J. Heyman Service to America Medals
      • Crafoord Prize
      • Fellows of the Royal Society
      • Canada Gairdner Awards
    • Organization & Leadership
    • Our Programs
      • NCI
      • NEI
      • NHGRI
      • NHLBI
      • NIA
      • NIAAA
      • NIAID
      • NIAMS
      • NIBIB
      • NICHD
      • NIDA
      • NIDCD
      • NIDCR
      • NIDDK
      • NIEHS
      • NIMH
      • NIMHD
      • NINDS
      • NINR
      • NLM
      • CC
      • NCATS
      • NCCIH
    • Research Campus Locations
    • Contact Information
  • Our Research
    • Scientific Focus Areas
      • Biomedical Engineering & Biophysics
      • Cancer Biology
      • Cell Biology
      • Chemical Biology
      • Chromosome Biology
      • Clinical Research
      • Computational Biology
      • Developmental Biology
      • Epidemiology
      • Genetics & Genomics
      • Health Disparities
      • Immunology
      • Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
      • Molecular Biology & Biochemistry
      • Molecular Pharmacology
      • Neuroscience
      • RNA Biology
      • Social & Behavioral Sciences
      • Stem Cell Biology
      • Structural Biology
      • Systems Biology
      • Virology
    • Principal Investigators
      • View by Investigator Name
      • View by Scientific Focus Area
    • Accomplishments
      • View All Accomplishments by Date
      • View All Health Topics
      • The Body
      • Health & Wellness
      • Conditions & Diseases
      • Procedures
    • Accelerating Science
      • Investing in Cutting-Edge Animal Models
      • Creating Cell-Based Therapies
      • Advancing Computational and Structural Biology
      • Combating Drug Resistance
      • Developing Novel Imaging Techniques
      • Charting the Pathways of Inflammation
      • Zooming in on the Microbiome
      • Uncovering New Opportunities for Natural Products
      • Stimulating Neuroscience Research
      • Pursuing Precision Medicine
      • Unlocking the Potential of RNA Biology and Therapeutics
      • Producing Novel Vaccines
    • Research in Action
      • View All Stories
      • Too Much of a Good Thing
      • Turning Face Perception on Its Head
      • Safeguarding a Second Chance at Life
      • A Biological Betrayal
    • Trans-IRP Research Resources
      • Supercomputing
    • IRP Review Process
    • Commercializing Inventions
  • NIH Clinical Center
    • Clinical Center Facilities
    • Advancing Translational Science
    • Clinical Trials
      • Get Involved with Clinical Research
      • Physician Resources
  • News & Events
    • In the News
    • I am Intramural Blog
    • Speaking of Science Podcast
    • SciBites Video Shorts
    • The NIH Catalyst Newsletter
    • Events
  • Careers
    • Faculty-Level Scientific Careers
    • Trans-NIH Scientific Recruitments
      • Stadtman Tenure-Track Investigators
        • Science, the Stadtman Way
        • Earl Stadtman Investigator Frequently Asked Questions
      • Lasker Clinical Research Scholars
      • Independent Research Scholar
    • Scientific & Clinical Careers
    • Administrative Careers
  • Research Training
    • Program Information
    • Training Opportunities
    • NIH Work/Life Resources
I am Intramural Blog

Perceived Pain Drives Body’s Automatic Nervous System Response

By Brandon Levy

Tuesday, July 3, 2018

According to a new IRP study, the body’s automatic response to painfully high temperatures is driven more by how much pain a person feels than by how high the temperature is. 

Everyone has a different pain threshold; a plate that’s too hot for one person to touch might be easily handled by someone else, for example. Now, IRP researchers have found the first evidence that a person’s sensation of a painful temperature more strongly influences the body’s automatic response to it than does the actual temperature.1

When a dangerously hot or cold object comes into contact with the skin, it triggers a response from the body’s autonomic nervous system (ANS), which manages bodily functions that are beyond our conscious control, such as breathing and digestion. While scientists have thoroughly studied how the ANS reacts to pain, they are still debating whether the physical properties of a painful event have a larger influence on that response than how much pain the event causes a person. In other words, some contend that the body will always react more strongly to a 200-degree object than a 150-degree object, while others believe the autonomic response will be more profound when someone experiences more pain, regardless of the actual temperature involved.

“In the field of psychology, it is widely known that our minds can affect our bodies,” says IRP investigator Lauren Atlas, Ph.D., the study’s senior author. “That has been shown in the areas of learning and emotion, so we wanted to test that same idea in the context of pain.”

Dr. Atlas’ study was the first to separate the influences of temperature and perceived pain on ANS responses. To accomplish that, her team used two different experimental tasks and measured two components of the ANS response: pupil widening, or ‘dilation,’ and the skin conductance response, an increase in the skin’s ability to conduct electricity caused by increased sweating.

In one of the experimental tasks, the researchers exposed the participants to temperatures tailored to the subjects’ individual sensitivities to heat, and, on every trial, the experimenters asked them how painful the stimulus was. On the second task, every participant experienced the same range of temperatures and reported whether each was painful or not. Participants who categorized a temperature as painful subsequently rated how painful it was to them, while those who judged a temperature to not be painful reported how hot it felt to them.

Statistical analyses performed by Dr. Atlas’ team revealed that when a temperature was not classified as painful, the participants’ ANS responses were stronger when the temperature was higher. However, when a temperature caused pain, ANS responses were more closely related to participants’ personal judgments of how much pain the temperature caused them than to the temperature itself.

“If you look at two trials with the same temperature, a trial when a participant called that stimulus more painful elicited a greater autonomic response than the same exact temperature if he or she perceived it as less painful,” Dr. Atlas explains. “So, it’s more about how you perceive the temperature — the temperature itself is the same in those two trials, but when you call it more painful you have a stronger reaction.” Similarly, she says, if a participant judged two different temperatures to be equally painful, “we would expect to see the same physiological response.”

While the current study examined correlations between pain and the ANS response, the next step for this research will be to definitively prove that greater pain causes a stronger bodily reaction, as opposed to a greater ANS response causing people to feel more pain. Dr. Atlas plans to pursue similar experiments using different types of pain-causing events, as well as other kinds of negative and positive experiences. She is also curious whether the way the ANS reacts to pain differs for patients who experience chronic pain.

“This study shows that a person’s conscious experience of a stimulus is most important for determining how his or her body responds,” Dr. Atlas says. “From that, we can try to use careful experimental techniques to understand the different factors that contribute to individuals’ conscious experiences of pain.”

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter to stay up-to-date on the latest breakthroughs in the NIH Intramural Research Program.

References:

[1] Pain or nociception? Subjective experience mediates the effects of acute noxious heat on autonomic responses. Mischkowski D, Palacios-Barrios EE, Banker L, Dildine TC, Atlas LY. Pain. 2018 Apr;159(4):699-711. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001132.


Category: Science
Tags: pain, temperature, neuroscience, Test Tube Tuesday

Related Blog Posts

  • Mirror Therapy Alters Brain Response in Phantom Limb Patients
  • Moms’ Caffeine Consumption May Affect Babies’ Brains
  • Toxic Protein and Aging Combine Forces to Drive Brain Disease
  • Boosting Brain Activity to Suppress Snacking
  • Neuroimaging Study Supports Two-Stage Theory of Recall

This page was last updated on Tuesday, May 3, 2022

Blog menu

  • Contributing Authors
    • Anindita Ray
    • Brandon Levy
    • Devon Valera
    • Melissa Glim
  • Categories
    • Collaboration
    • Science
    • Resources
    • Making a Difference
    • Careers

Blog links

  • Subscribe to RSS feed

Get IRP Updates

Subscribe

  • Email
  • Print
  • Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Main navigation

  • About Us
    • What Is the IRP?
    • History
    • Honors
    • Organization & Leadership
    • Our Programs
    • Research Campus Locations
    • Contact Information
  • Our Research
    • Scientific Focus Areas
    • Principal Investigators
    • Accomplishments
    • Accelerating Science
    • Research in Action
    • Trans-IRP Research Resources
    • IRP Review Process
    • Commercializing Inventions
  • NIH Clinical Center
    • Clinical Center Facilities
    • Advancing Translational Science
    • Clinical Trials
  • News & Events
    • In the News
    • I am Intramural Blog
    • Speaking of Science Podcast
    • SciBites Video Shorts
    • The NIH Catalyst Newsletter
    • Events
  • Careers
    • Faculty-Level Scientific Careers
    • Trans-NIH Scientific Recruitments
    • Scientific & Clinical Careers
    • Administrative Careers
  • Research Training
    • Program Information
    • Training Opportunities
    • NIH Work/Life Resources
  • Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • USA.gov

Footer

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • IRP Brand Materials
  • HHS Vulnerability Disclosure
  • Web Policies & Notices
  • Site Map
  • Search